New Regulations of Golf Verdict Restricts Usage of Video Appraisal
FAR HILLS, N.J. and ST ANDREWS, Scotland, April 25: The USGA
along with The R&A have circulated a new Decision on the Rules of Golf to restrict
the usage of video confirmation in the game, applicable straightaway.
The two organizations have furthermore launched a functioning
set of LPGA, PGA Tour, PGA European Tour, Ladies European Tour and PGA of
America delegates to straightaway launch a wide-ranging appraisal of extensive
video topics, comprising observer call-ins, which occur in televised contests.
New Decision 34-3/10 applies two criteria for Rules boards
to restrict the usage of video: 1) when video divulges proof that could not sensibly
be perceived with the "naked eye," and 2) when players utilize their
"reasonable judgment" to fix a precise site when using the Rules.
The first norm asserts, "The use of video technology
can make it possible to identify things that could not be seen with the naked
eye." An instance comprises a player who mistakenly contacts a few grains
of sand in taking a backswing with a club in a bunker while making a stroke.
If the board deduces that such evidences could not sensibly
have been perceived with the naked eye and the player was not otherwise alert
of the possible violation, the player will be considered not to have broken the
Rules, even when video expertise reveals otherwise. This is an expansion of the
facility on ball-at-rest-moved cases, which was launched in 2014.
The second criterion is applicable when a player ascertains a
location, point, place, line, zone, distance or other site in following the
Rules, and distinguishes that a player should not be held to the level of accuracy
that can sometimes be delivered by video expertise. Instances comprise verifying
the closest point of relief or substituting a lifted ball.
As long as the player does what can sensibly be anticipated
under the settings to make a precise resolve, the player's sensible decision
will be acknowledged, even if later revealed to be imprecise by the application
of video proof.
Both of these criteria have been broadly deliberated as component
of the Rules upgrading scheme. The USGA and The R&A have agreed to endorse
this Decision straightaway owing to the numerous tough subjects evolving from
video appraisal in televised golf.
The criteria in the Decision do not alter any of the present
necessities in the Rules, as the player must still function with precaution,
report all recognized violations of the Rules and attempt to do what is judiciously
anticipated in making a precise resolve when using the Rules.
Video-linked subjects that necessitate a greater appraisal
by the functioning set comprise the usage of facts from sources excluding partakers
for example phone calls, email or social media, and the use of fines after a
score card has been send back.
USGA Executive Director/CEO Mike Davis revealed, "This
important first step provides officials with tools that can have a direct and
positive impact on the game. We recognize there is more work to be done.
Advancements in video technology are enhancing the viewing experience for fans,
but can also significantly affect the competition. We need to balance those
advances with what is fair for all players when applying the Rules."
Martin Slumbers, Chief Executive of The R&A, stated,
"We have been considering the impact of video review on the game and feel
it is important to introduce a Decision to give greater clarity in this area.
Golf has always been a game of integrity and we want to ensure that the
emphasis remains as much as possible on the reasonable judgment of the player
rather than on what video technology can show."
The USGA as well as The R&A will deliberate extra alterations
endorsed by the functioning set for execution prior to Jan. 1, 2019, when the
new system resulting from the collective effort to update golf's Rules becomes
effective.
Comments
Post a Comment